RSSB vs. KEAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) and KEAT (Keating Active ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSSB returned 27.89% vs 24.92% for KEAT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSSB charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for KEAT.

Performance

RSSB vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than KEAT's 9.05% return.

RSSB

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: 27.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEAT

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: 9.05%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 24.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSB vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	9.57%	25.16%	4.74%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	9.05%	22.76%	2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and KEAT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024	0.44

RSSB vs. KEAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSSB	KEAT
Technology	27.9%	-
Financial Services	15.9%	1.0%
Industrials	11.5%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	-
Communication Services	8.3%	15.0%
Healthcare	8.2%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	22.2%
Energy	4.3%	30.9%
Basic Materials	4.1%	21.7%
Utilities	2.7%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	0.6%

Return for Risk

RSSB vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 52
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 56

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 73
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSB vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSSB	KEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.44	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.32	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	4.14	-1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	11.38	-1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSSB vs. KEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the KEAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and KEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSSB	KEAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.44	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	1.52	-0.23

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and KEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSB	KEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-7.45%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-6.04%	-5.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-5.92%	+4.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.26%	-1.57%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	2.20%	+0.64%

Volatility

RSSB vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Keating Active ETF (KEAT) at 2.55%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSB	KEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	2.55%	+2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.64%	8.32%	+4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.26%	10.25%	+5.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	10.27%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	10.27%	+6.32%

RSSB vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSB vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than KEAT's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.25%	2.48%	1.72%	0.00%
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.18%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSB and KEAT in my portfolio?

RSSB and KEAT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSSB or KEAT?

RSSB has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to KEAT (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs KEAT's -7.45%.

Which ETF is better, RSSB or KEAT?

On 1-year performance, RSSB leads with 27.89% vs 24.92% for KEAT. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, KEAT has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSB or KEAT?

Over the 1-year period, RSSB has performed better with a 27.89% return vs 24.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSB or KEAT?

RSSB is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for KEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSB or KEAT?

RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.25% for KEAT.

What is the main difference between RSSB and KEAT?

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Keating. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for RSSB and 0.85% for KEAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.