RSSB vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSSB is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. RSSB is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, RSSB returned 27.96% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSSB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

RSSB vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.

RSSB

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: 9.67%
• 6M: 9.47%
• 1Y: 27.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSB vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	9.67%	25.16%	10.53%	6.63%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.39%	4.96%	5.25%	0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and IBIC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023	0.06

The correlation between RSSB and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSSB vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 52
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSB vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSB	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	4.94	-3.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	8.90	-6.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	2.21	-0.90
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	16.41	-14.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.72	58.11	-48.39

RSSB vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSB	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-0.90%	-15.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-0.27%	-11.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-0.11%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.26%	-0.10%	-2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	0.08%	+2.80%

Volatility

RSSB vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSB	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.12%	0.16%	+5.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.61%	0.67%	+12.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.10%	0.89%	+15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	1.57%	+15.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.80%	1.57%	+15.23%

RSSB vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSB vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.17%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSB and IBIC in my portfolio?

RSSB and IBIC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSSB or IBIC?

RSSB has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, RSSB or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, RSSB leads with 27.96% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSB or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, RSSB has performed better with a 27.96% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSB or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RSSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSB or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.17% for RSSB.

What is the main difference between RSSB and IBIC?

RSSB is categorized as Global Allocation, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RSSB and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.