PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRNEX vs. PRGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRNEX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNEX achieves a 16.19% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 41.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PRNEX has underperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.64% annualized return.


PRNEX

1D
-0.70%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
16.19%
6M
16.19%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
8.18%

PRGTX

1D
4.32%
1M
6.93%
YTD
41.85%
6M
43.19%
1Y
74.68%
3Y*
38.16%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
19.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNEX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRNEX
T. Rowe Price New Era Fund
16.19%18.85%4.41%1.02%7.14%25.35%-2.63%16.91%-16.23%10.57%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
41.85%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%8.85%75.77%34.22%-10.07%47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNEX and PRGTX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between PRNEX and PRGTX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRNEX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNEX
PRNEX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PRNEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNEX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRNEXPRGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

5.69

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.06

16.90

-0.84

PRNEX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNEX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRNEX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNEX drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNEX and PRGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNEXPRGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.56%

-71.18%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-13.06%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.19%

-26.67%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-65.29%

+43.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.64%

-65.29%

+15.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.59%

-1.62%

-4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-21.51%

+5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

4.38%

-2.52%

Volatility

PRNEX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price New Era Fund (PRNEX) is 5.42%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that PRNEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNEXPRGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

13.52%

-8.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

22.05%

-10.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

25.95%

-10.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

32.17%

-13.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

28.63%

-8.00%

PRNEX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNEX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRNEX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

PRNEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%
PRNEX
T. Rowe Price New Era Fund
7.78%9.04%4.81%11.46%4.47%2.07%2.54%2.18%1.69%1.89%1.28%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRNEX and PRGTX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGTX has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to PRNEX (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNEX dropped -66.56% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRNEX and PRGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer