PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 9.39%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


RSPU

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.41%
6M
6.56%
YTD
9.22%
1Y
15.04%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
9.39%

IDMO

1D
-0.66%
1M
-2.44%
6M
4.42%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
24.23%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
9.22%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
7.56%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and IDMO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.23

The correlation between RSPU and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPU vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPU
IDMO

Utilities

100.0%
7.9%

Financial Services

0.4%
43.2%

Basic Materials

-

10.6%

Communication Services

-

2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Energy

-

1.7%

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Industrials

-

21.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

6.2%

Utilities

RSPU
100.0%
IDMO
7.9%

Financial Services

RSPU
0.4%
IDMO
43.2%

Basic Materials

RSPU

-

IDMO
10.6%

Communication Services

RSPU

-

IDMO
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPU

-

IDMO
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

RSPU

-

IDMO
2.5%

Energy

RSPU

-

IDMO
1.7%

Healthcare

RSPU

-

IDMO
1.1%

Industrials

RSPU

-

IDMO
21.3%

Real Estate

RSPU

-

IDMO
1.8%

Technology

RSPU

-

IDMO
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPUIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.64

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

6.39

-2.50

RSPU vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-39.38%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-12.31%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-12.65%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-27.07%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-31.34%

-5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-4.56%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-9.70%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.14%

+0.73%

Volatility

RSPU vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is 4.58%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that RSPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

5.90%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

16.88%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

18.54%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

18.13%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

17.89%

+1.23%

RSPU vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPU vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than IDMO's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.72%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.51%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and IDMO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to RSPU (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.40% vs 9.39% for RSPU. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 2.51% for RSPU.

RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer