PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. FXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. FXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than FXU's 6.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPU having a 9.42% annualized return and FXU not far behind at 9.22%.


RSPU

1D
1.69%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
5.10%
6M
3.75%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
9.42%

FXU

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
6.21%
6M
4.77%
1Y
13.68%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. FXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
5.10%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
6.21%21.86%22.50%-2.12%3.68%17.67%1.53%11.67%5.43%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and FXU is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.87

The correlation between RSPU and FXU shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPU vs. FXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPU
FXU

Utilities

100.0%
92.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.7%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

RSPU
100.0%
FXU
92.0%

Basic Materials

RSPU

-

FXU

-

Communication Services

RSPU

-

FXU

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPU

-

FXU

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPU

-

FXU

-

Energy

RSPU

-

FXU
3.7%

Financial Services

RSPU

-

FXU

-

Healthcare

RSPU

-

FXU

-

Industrials

RSPU

-

FXU
4.2%

Real Estate

RSPU

-

FXU

-

Technology

RSPU

-

FXU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. FXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FXU
FXU Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. FXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPUFXUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.04

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

1.48

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.62

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.26

4.59

-1.33

RSPU vs. FXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the FXU Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and FXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPUFXUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.04

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.71

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.50

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.42

+0.05

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. FXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, roughly equal to the maximum FXU drawdown of -49.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and FXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUFXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-49.00%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-8.63%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-17.46%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-21.87%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-34.81%

-2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-7.31%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-7.64%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

3.04%

+0.56%

Volatility

RSPU vs. FXU - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) at 4.69%. This indicates that RSPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUFXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.69%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

10.36%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

13.17%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.59%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

18.33%

+0.76%

RSPU vs. FXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FXU's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPU vs. FXU - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than FXU's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
2.20%2.29%2.41%2.52%2.03%2.00%3.97%2.34%2.40%3.81%2.62%3.90%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.53%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, RSPU and FXU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RSPU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FXU (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs FXU's -49.00%.

On 10-year performance, RSPU leads with 9.42% vs 9.22% for FXU. On fees, RSPU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FXU has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPU has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.20% for FXU.

RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.62% for FXU.

FXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and FXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer