PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. FUTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 3.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPU having a 9.46% annualized return and FUTY not far behind at 9.10%.


RSPU

1D
0.53%
1M
-3.56%
YTD
5.38%
6M
4.52%
1Y
13.40%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
9.46%

FUTY

1D
0.60%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
3.78%
6M
1.95%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
5.38%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
3.78%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and FUTY is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.97

The correlation between RSPU and FUTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPU vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPU
FUTY

Utilities

100.0%
99.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

RSPU
100.0%
FUTY
99.2%

Basic Materials

RSPU

-

FUTY

-

Communication Services

RSPU

-

FUTY

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPU

-

FUTY

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPU

-

FUTY

-

Energy

RSPU

-

FUTY
0.5%

Financial Services

RSPU

-

FUTY

-

Healthcare

RSPU

-

FUTY

-

Industrials

RSPU

-

FUTY
0.2%

Real Estate

RSPU

-

FUTY

-

Technology

RSPU

-

FUTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPUFUTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.36

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

3.05

+0.65

RSPU vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPUFUTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.85

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.54

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.48

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.55

-0.09

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than FUTY's maximum drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and FUTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUFUTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-36.44%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-8.93%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-17.35%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-25.11%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-36.44%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.66%

-6.72%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-6.03%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

3.98%

-0.35%

Volatility

RSPU vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUFUTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.52%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

11.38%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

14.34%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

17.08%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

19.05%

+0.04%

RSPU vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPU vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than FUTY's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.60%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.52%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, RSPU and FUTY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FUTY has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to RSPU (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

On 10-year performance, RSPU leads with 9.46% vs 9.10% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPU has performed better with a 9.46% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.52% for RSPU.

RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.08% for FUTY.

RSPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and FUTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer