PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RSPT vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RSPT vs. USO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPT returned 22.48%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for USO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.

Performance

RSPT vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 22.48%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.

RSPT

1D
-0.76%
1M
22.88%
YTD
47.30%
6M
46.37%
1Y
75.62%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
22.48%

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF		47.30%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP		103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and USO is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006

0.23

The correlation between RSPT and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

United States Oil Fund LP

Often compared with RSPT:
RSPT vs. QQQRSPT vs. VOORSPT vs. QQQMRSPT vs. VGTRSPT vs. RSPDRSPT vs. QTECRSPT vs. NXT
Often compared with USO:
USO vs. XLEUSO vs. BNOUSO vs. UCOUSO vs. USLUSO vs. OILKUSO vs. DBOUSO vs. WTI

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RSPTUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.54
2.31

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.27
2.89

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.38

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.12

5.01

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.76

9.42

+16.34

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPT vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RSPTUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

2.31

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.68

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.10

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

-0.18

+0.83

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and USO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RSPTUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-98.19%

+39.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-20.39%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-26.05%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-36.23%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-86.75%

+53.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-85.01%

+84.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-75.30%

+66.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

10.82%

-7.87%

Volatility

RSPT vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is 7.02%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that RSPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RSPTUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

14.87%

-7.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

38.23%

-21.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

44.20%

-22.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

36.06%

-11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

39.00%

-15.23%

RSPT vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPT vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF		0.25%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RSPT and USO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to RSPT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 22.48% vs 4.07% for USO. On fees, RSPT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

RSPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.86% for USO.

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer