RSPT vs. TRUT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. RSPT is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

RSPT vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.

RSPT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 22.88%
• YTD: 47.30%
• 6M: 46.37%
• 1Y: 75.62%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: 19.46%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

TRUT

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 16.68%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 24.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	47.30%	11.80%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	25.30%	10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and TRUT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 91
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPT	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPT	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	2.39	-1.74

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-18.55%	-40.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-1.46%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.90%	-5.17%	-3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.55%	21.53%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.08%	21.53%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.77%	21.53%	+2.24%

RSPT vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPT vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.25%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.19%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPT and TRUT in my portfolio?

RSPT and TRUT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSPT or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPT or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPT or TRUT?

RSPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between RSPT and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.13% for TRUT.