PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 38.00% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV's 21.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 21.84%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 18.57% annualized return.


RSPT

1D
1.46%
1M
6.83%
YTD
38.00%
6M
36.68%
1Y
63.04%
3Y*
29.59%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
21.84%

TDIV

1D
0.97%
1M
3.59%
YTD
21.17%
6M
20.34%
1Y
37.96%
3Y*
28.42%
5Y*
17.37%
10Y*
18.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
38.00%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
21.17%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and TDIV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.92

The correlation between RSPT and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPT
TDIV

Technology

97.4%
87.1%

Energy

1.5%

-

Industrials

1.1%
1.3%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RSPT
97.4%
TDIV
87.1%

Energy

RSPT
1.5%
TDIV

-

Industrials

RSPT
1.1%
TDIV
1.3%

Financial Services

RSPT
0.0%
TDIV

-

Basic Materials

RSPT

-

TDIV

-

Communication Services

RSPT

-

TDIV
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPT

-

TDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPT

-

TDIV

-

Healthcare

RSPT

-

TDIV

-

Real Estate

RSPT

-

TDIV

-

Utilities

RSPT

-

TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPTTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

3.23

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.68

9.78

+8.90

RSPT vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-31.97%

-26.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-11.35%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-23.00%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-31.97%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-31.97%

-1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

-8.87%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-4.85%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.74%

-0.50%

Volatility

RSPT vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) at 9.90%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.32%

9.90%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.35%

15.62%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.22%

19.72%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.38%

20.90%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

20.96%

+2.96%

RSPT vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPT vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than TDIV's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.27%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.20%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RSPT and TDIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RSPT has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to TDIV (9.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 21.84% vs 18.57% for TDIV. On fees, RSPT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 9.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 18.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.27% for RSPT.

RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.50% for TDIV.

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer