RSPT vs. SPMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPT returned 22.48%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for SPMO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

RSPT vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 30.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 22.48%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.95% annualized return.

RSPT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 22.88%
• YTD: 47.30%
• 6M: 46.37%
• 1Y: 75.62%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: 19.46%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

SPMO

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 15.36%
• YTD: 30.35%
• 6M: 30.51%
• 1Y: 46.00%
• 3Y*: 43.04%
• 5Y*: 24.29%
• 10Y*: 20.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	47.30%	22.15%	15.16%	35.18%	-24.50%	28.53%	30.21%	42.07%	-0.61%	32.98%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	30.35%	26.58%	45.82%	17.56%	-10.45%	22.64%	28.25%	25.93%	-0.92%	27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and SPMO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015	0.73

The correlation between RSPT and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPT	SPMO
Technology	97.6%	52.6%
Energy	1.4%	3.4%
Industrials	1.0%	11.3%
Financial Services	0.1%	5.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.6%
Communication Services	-	9.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.3%
Healthcare	-	6.7%
Real Estate	-	1.0%
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 91
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPT	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.54	2.62	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	3.54	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.47	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.12	3.64	+3.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.76	14.17	+11.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPT vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPT	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.54	2.62	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	1.27	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	1.03	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	1.01	-0.36

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and SPMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	SPMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-30.95%	-27.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-12.70%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	-20.13%	-6.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-22.74%	-9.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	-30.95%	-2.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	0.00%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.90%	-4.60%	-4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.26%	-0.31%

Volatility

RSPT vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 7.02% and 7.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	SPMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	7.35%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.12%	14.39%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.55%	17.64%	+3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.08%	19.30%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.77%	20.31%	+3.46%

RSPT vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPT vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.25%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.65%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPT and SPMO in my portfolio?

RSPT and SPMO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPT or SPMO?

SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to RSPT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

Which ETF is better, RSPT or SPMO?

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 22.48% vs 20.95% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, RSPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPT or SPMO?

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 20.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPT or SPMO?

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPT or SPMO?

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.25% for RSPT.

What is the main difference between RSPT and SPMO?

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.13% for SPMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.