PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 37.17% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 45.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 22.05%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.39% annualized return.


RSPT

1D
-3.45%
1M
2.35%
YTD
37.17%
6M
34.77%
1Y
59.82%
3Y*
30.81%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
22.05%

IDGT

1D
-1.84%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
45.86%
6M
44.45%
1Y
53.87%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
37.17%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
45.86%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and IDGT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.81

The correlation between RSPT and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPT
IDGT

Technology

97.6%
56.9%

Energy

1.4%

-

Industrials

0.9%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

35.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RSPT
97.6%
IDGT
56.9%

Energy

RSPT
1.4%
IDGT

-

Industrials

RSPT
0.9%
IDGT

-

Financial Services

RSPT
0.0%
IDGT

-

Basic Materials

RSPT

-

IDGT

-

Communication Services

RSPT

-

IDGT
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPT

-

IDGT

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPT

-

IDGT

-

Healthcare

RSPT

-

IDGT

-

Real Estate

RSPT

-

IDGT
35.5%

Utilities

RSPT

-

IDGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPTIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

6.00

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.83

17.17

+0.66

RSPT vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-77.95%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-9.02%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-23.74%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-35.83%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-36.88%

+3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.58%

-6.71%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-19.88%

+10.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.15%

+0.21%

Volatility

RSPT vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 9.03%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.54%

9.03%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.81%

17.61%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.79%

21.41%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.52%

23.35%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

23.32%

+0.62%

RSPT vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPT vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than IDGT's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.74%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.26%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPT and IDGT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPT has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to IDGT (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 22.05% vs 14.39% for IDGT. On fees, RSPT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 22.05% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.26% for RSPT.

RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer