RSPT vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - RSPT tracks the S&P 500® Information Technology Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RSPT returned 59.82% vs 16.75% for CRTC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

RSPT vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 37.17% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 4.11% return.

RSPT

• 1D: -3.45%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 37.17%
• 6M: 34.77%
• 1Y: 59.82%
• 3Y*: 30.81%
• 5Y*: 17.50%
• 10Y*: 22.05%

CRTC

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 6M: 3.35%
• 1Y: 16.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	37.17%	22.15%	15.16%	10.81%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	4.11%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and CRTC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.86

The correlation between RSPT and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPT	CRTC
Technology	97.6%	39.5%
Energy	1.4%	6.0%
Industrials	0.9%	12.6%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.1%
Communication Services	-	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	12.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 81
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 38
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPT	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	1.24	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	1.70	+1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.22	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.24	1.86	+3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.83	6.48	+11.35

RSPT vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-19.07%	-39.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.47%	-9.05%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.58%	-5.35%	-2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-2.17%	-6.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	2.59%	+0.77%

Volatility

RSPT vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 5.76%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.54%	5.76%	+6.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.81%	10.64%	+9.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.79%	13.55%	+10.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.52%	15.88%	+8.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.94%	15.88%	+8.06%

RSPT vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPT vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than CRTC's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.91%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.26%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPT and CRTC in my portfolio?

RSPT and CRTC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPT or CRTC?

RSPT has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to CRTC (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, RSPT or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, RSPT leads with 59.82% vs 16.75% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPT or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 59.82% return vs 16.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPT or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPT or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.26% for RSPT.

What is the main difference between RSPT and CRTC?

RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.