RSPT vs. COR

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while COR (Cencora Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RSPT returned 21.21%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for COR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RSPT vs. COR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Cencora Inc. (COR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 36.57% return, which is significantly higher than COR's -10.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed COR with an annualized return of 21.21%, while COR has yielded a comparatively lower 16.84% annualized return.

RSPT

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -1.03%
• 6M: 31.91%
• YTD: 36.57%
• 1Y: 52.02%
• 3Y*: 28.12%
• 5Y*: 17.11%
• 10Y*: 21.21%

COR

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 7.32%
• 6M: -12.25%
• YTD: -10.14%
• 1Y: 2.53%
• 3Y*: 17.45%
• 5Y*: 23.51%
• 10Y*: 16.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. COR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	36.57%	22.15%	15.16%	35.18%	-24.50%	28.53%	30.21%	42.07%	-0.61%	32.98%
COR Cencora Inc.	-10.14%	51.48%	10.37%	25.33%	26.26%	44.09%	23.37%	23.51%	-17.57%	19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and COR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.33

The correlation between RSPT and COR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. COR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 82
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

COR

COR Risk / Return Rank: 46
COR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
COR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
COR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
COR Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
COR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. COR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Cencora Inc. (COR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPT	COR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	0.08	+2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	0.30	+2.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.05	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	0.08	+4.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.75	0.19	+13.56

RSPT vs. COR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the COR Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and COR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. COR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum COR drawdown of -71.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and COR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	COR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-71.01%	+12.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.47%	-32.44%	+20.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	-32.44%	+5.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-32.44%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	-32.44%	-1.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.98%	-19.01%	+11.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-13.65%	+4.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	13.25%	-9.46%

Volatility

RSPT vs. COR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Cencora Inc. (COR) at 7.07%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	COR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	7.07%	+2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.47%	27.56%	-7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.48%	30.51%	-6.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.68%	22.43%	+2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.97%	27.51%	-3.54%

Dividends

RSPT vs. COR - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than COR's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COR Cencora Inc.	0.78%	0.67%	0.93%	0.96%	1.13%	5.13%	6.74%	7.48%	2.07%	1.61%	1.77%	1.17%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.26%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPT and COR in my portfolio?

RSPT and COR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPT or COR?

RSPT has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to COR (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs COR's -71.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.