RSPS vs. FDFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX).
RSPS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. FDFAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 28, 1985.
Performance
RSPS vs. FDFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSPS vs. FDFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.40% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
FDFAX Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio | 5.95% | -1.31% | -0.14% | 3.02% | -0.44% | 14.43% | 11.60% | 31.79% | -15.91% | 12.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than FDFAX's 5.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed FDFAX with an annualized return of 4.26%, while FDFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.17% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -10.53%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- -1.52%
- 3Y*
- -2.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
FDFAX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPS vs. FDFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FDFAX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. FDFAX — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
FDFAX
RSPS vs. FDFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPS | FDFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 0.35 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 0.62 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 0.49 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 1.03 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPS | FDFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 0.35 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.35 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.81 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and FDFAX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSPS vs. FDFAX - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than FDFAX's 6.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.84% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
FDFAX Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio | 6.08% | 6.45% | 2.73% | 5.13% | 3.34% | 10.73% | 3.16% | 2.78% | 14.36% | 8.82% | 4.71% | 9.06% |
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. FDFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum FDFAX drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and FDFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | FDFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -38.29% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -9.18% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -15.78% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -27.66% | +2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.60% | -8.07% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -5.18% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 4.39% | +0.14% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. FDFAX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) at 3.77%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | FDFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 3.77% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 9.22% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.76% | 14.74% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 13.84% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 14.96% | -0.12% |