RSPR vs. XMMO
RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPR is a REIT fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPR returned 6.30%/yr vs 20.13%/yr for XMMO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
RSPR vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 22.90% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPR has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 6.30%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.13% annualized return.
RSPR
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 10.68%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
XMMO
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 6M
- 20.25%
- 1Y
- 35.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 20.13%
RSPR vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 10.68% | -1.88% | 8.61% | 11.59% | -25.16% | 49.61% | -2.90% | 24.62% | -4.11% | 8.76% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.90% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPR and XMMO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2015 | 0.47 |
The correlation between RSPR and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPR vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
RSPR
XMMO
RSPR vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPR | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.32 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 4.31 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | 17.07 | -15.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPR vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPR | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.96% | -55.37% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -8.34% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | -24.93% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.03% | -27.91% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.96% | -36.74% | -5.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -2.42% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -9.43% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 2.10% | +1.85% |
Volatility
RSPR vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 4.92%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPR | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 8.50% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 16.79% | -6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.59% | 19.94% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 21.65% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 22.33% | -0.91% |
RSPR vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPR vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than XMMO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 2.84% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 2.56% | 3.82% | 2.48% | 3.02% | 3.01% | 2.06% | 1.03% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.57% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPR and XMMO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to RSPR (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 20.13% vs 6.30% for RSPR. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 20.13% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.
RSPR has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.57% for XMMO.
RSPR is categorized as REIT, while XMMO is Momentum. RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPR and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer