PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPR vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPR vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


RSPR

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.06%
YTD
7.75%
6M
8.11%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
6.22%

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPR vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
7.75%-1.88%8.61%11.59%-25.16%49.61%9.92%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and QQQM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPR and QQQM has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSPR vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPR
QQQM

Real Estate

96.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Real Estate

RSPR
96.9%
QQQM
0.1%

Basic Materials

RSPR
3.1%
QQQM
1.1%

Financial Services

RSPR
0.0%
QQQM
0.2%

Communication Services

RSPR

-

QQQM
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPR

-

QQQM
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

RSPR

-

QQQM
7.7%

Energy

RSPR

-

QQQM
0.6%

Healthcare

RSPR

-

QQQM
4.2%

Industrials

RSPR

-

QQQM
2.8%

Technology

RSPR

-

QQQM
53.8%

Utilities

RSPR

-

QQQM
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPR vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPRQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

2.65

-2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

3.46

-2.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.45

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

3.53

-2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.44

13.52

-12.08

RSPR vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPRQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.65

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.82

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.85

-0.55

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPRQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-35.04%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-11.96%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-22.70%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

-35.04%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-0.20%

-4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-8.25%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

3.11%

+0.83%

Volatility

RSPR vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 3.69%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPRQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

4.48%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

12.05%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

15.91%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

22.24%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

22.12%

-0.75%

RSPR vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPR vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.68%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPR and QQQM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to RSPR (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 2.40% for RSPR. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 2.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.

RSPR has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

RSPR is categorized as REIT, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPR and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer