RSPR vs. QQQM
RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPR is a REIT fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPR returned 2.40%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
RSPR vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
RSPR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 5.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.22%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPR vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 7.75% | -1.88% | 8.61% | 11.59% | -25.16% | 49.61% | 9.92% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPR and QQQM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSPR and QQQM has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSPR vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPR
QQQM
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
RSPR
QQQM
Basic Materials
RSPR
QQQM
Financial Services
RSPR
QQQM
Communication Services
RSPR
-
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
RSPR
-
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
RSPR
-
QQQM
Energy
RSPR
-
QQQM
Healthcare
RSPR
-
QQQM
Industrials
RSPR
-
QQQM
Technology
RSPR
-
QQQM
Utilities
RSPR
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPR vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
RSPR
QQQM
RSPR vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 2.65 | -2.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 3.46 | -2.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.45 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 3.53 | -2.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 13.52 | -12.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 2.65 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.82 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.85 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
RSPR vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.96% | -35.04% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -11.96% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | -22.70% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.03% | -35.04% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | -0.20% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -8.25% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 3.11% | +0.83% |
Volatility
RSPR vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 3.69%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 4.48% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 12.05% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 15.91% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 22.24% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 22.12% | -0.75% |
RSPR vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPR vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 2.68% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 2.56% | 3.82% | 2.48% | 3.02% | 3.01% | 2.06% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPR and QQQM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to RSPR (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 2.40% for RSPR. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 2.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.
RSPR has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
RSPR is categorized as REIT, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPR and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer