PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPR has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 6.22%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.


RSPR

1D
0.79%
1M
0.48%
YTD
7.82%
6M
7.98%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
6.22%

QQQ

1D
0.46%
1M
10.68%
YTD
21.62%
6M
20.27%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
21.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
7.82%-1.88%8.61%11.59%-25.16%49.61%-2.90%24.62%-4.11%8.76%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.62%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and QQQ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015

0.37

The correlation between RSPR and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPR
QQQ

Real Estate

96.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Real Estate

RSPR
96.9%
QQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

RSPR
3.1%
QQQ
1.1%

Financial Services

RSPR
0.0%
QQQ
0.2%

Communication Services

RSPR

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPR

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

RSPR

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

RSPR

-

QQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

RSPR

-

QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

RSPR

-

QQQ
2.8%

Technology

RSPR

-

QQQ
53.8%

Utilities

RSPR

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPRQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

2.73

-2.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.63

3.55

-2.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.47

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

3.71

-3.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.34

14.30

-12.96

RSPR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPRQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

2.73

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.83

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.99

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.41

-0.11

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPRQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-82.97%

+41.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-11.96%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-22.77%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

-35.12%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.96%

-35.12%

-6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

0.00%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-32.79%

+23.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

3.11%

+0.83%

Volatility

RSPR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 3.76%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPRQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

4.48%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

12.11%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

15.95%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

22.39%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

22.30%

-0.93%

RSPR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.68%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to RSPR (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.97% vs 6.22% for RSPR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.

RSPR has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

RSPR is categorized as REIT, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPR and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer