PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPR vs. IVRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPR vs. IVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than IVRA's 11.70% return.


RSPR

1D
0.79%
1M
0.48%
YTD
7.82%
6M
7.98%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
6.22%

IVRA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.94%
1Y
15.80%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPR vs. IVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
7.82%-1.88%8.61%11.59%-25.16%49.61%2.09%
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
11.70%10.20%13.07%9.13%-10.00%32.74%1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and IVRA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020

0.83

The correlation between RSPR and IVRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPR vs. IVRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPR
IVRA

Real Estate

96.9%
46.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
14.3%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.7%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

23.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

10.3%

Real Estate

RSPR
96.9%
IVRA
46.8%

Basic Materials

RSPR
3.1%
IVRA
14.3%

Financial Services

RSPR
0.0%
IVRA
0.7%

Communication Services

RSPR

-

IVRA

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPR

-

IVRA
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

RSPR

-

IVRA
1.7%

Energy

RSPR

-

IVRA
23.5%

Healthcare

RSPR

-

IVRA

-

Industrials

RSPR

-

IVRA

-

Technology

RSPR

-

IVRA

-

Utilities

RSPR

-

IVRA
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPR vs. IVRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IVRA
IVRA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. IVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPRIVRADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

1.73

-1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.63

2.50

-1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.36

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

3.80

-3.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.34

13.28

-11.94

RSPR vs. IVRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the IVRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and IVRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPRIVRADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

1.73

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.46

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.73

-0.43

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. IVRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, which is greater than IVRA's maximum drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and IVRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPRIVRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-25.99%

-15.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-4.60%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-15.03%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

-25.99%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-0.92%

-3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-7.27%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

1.32%

+2.62%

Volatility

RSPR vs. IVRA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) at 0.00%. This indicates that RSPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPRIVRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

0.00%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

5.53%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

9.29%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

16.58%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

16.40%

+4.97%

RSPR vs. IVRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IVRA's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPR vs. IVRA - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than IVRA's 16.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
16.99%5.68%3.71%2.47%2.30%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.68%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPR and IVRA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPR has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs IVRA's -25.99%.

On 5-year performance, IVRA leads with 7.61% vs 2.37% for RSPR. On fees, RSPR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVRA has performed better with a 7.61% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 2.68% for RSPR.

RSPR is categorized as REIT, while IVRA is ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.59% for IVRA.

IVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPR and IVRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer