RSPR vs. IVRA
RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) and IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPR is a REIT fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco. RSPR is passively managed, while IVRA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPR returned 2.37%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for IVRA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IVRA.
Performance
RSPR vs. IVRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than IVRA's 11.70% return.
RSPR
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 6.22%
IVRA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPR vs. IVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 7.82% | -1.88% | 8.61% | 11.59% | -25.16% | 49.61% | 2.09% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 10.20% | 13.07% | 9.13% | -10.00% | 32.74% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPR and IVRA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020 | 0.83 |
The correlation between RSPR and IVRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPR vs. IVRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPR
IVRA
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
RSPR
IVRA
Basic Materials
RSPR
IVRA
Financial Services
RSPR
IVRA
Communication Services
RSPR
-
IVRA
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPR
-
IVRA
Consumer Defensive
RSPR
-
IVRA
Energy
RSPR
-
IVRA
Healthcare
RSPR
-
IVRA
-
Industrials
RSPR
-
IVRA
-
Technology
RSPR
-
IVRA
-
Utilities
RSPR
-
IVRA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPR vs. IVRA — Risk / Return Rank
RSPR
IVRA
RSPR vs. IVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPR | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 1.73 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.63 | 2.50 | -1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.36 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 3.80 | -3.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | 13.28 | -11.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPR | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 1.73 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.46 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.73 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
RSPR vs. IVRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, which is greater than IVRA's maximum drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and IVRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPR | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.96% | -25.99% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -4.60% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | -15.03% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.03% | -25.99% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -0.92% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -7.27% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 1.32% | +2.62% |
Volatility
RSPR vs. IVRA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) at 0.00%. This indicates that RSPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPR | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 0.00% | +3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 5.53% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 9.29% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 16.58% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 16.40% | +4.97% |
RSPR vs. IVRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IVRA's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPR vs. IVRA - Dividend Comparison
RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than IVRA's 16.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.99% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 2.68% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 2.56% | 3.82% | 2.48% | 3.02% | 3.01% | 2.06% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPR and IVRA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPR has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs IVRA's -25.99%.
On 5-year performance, IVRA leads with 7.61% vs 2.37% for RSPR. On fees, RSPR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVRA has performed better with a 7.61% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 2.68% for RSPR.
RSPR is categorized as REIT, while IVRA is ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPR and IVRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer