RSPR vs. BLDG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG).
RSPR and BLDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPR is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. It was launched on Aug 12, 2015. BLDG is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020.
Performance
RSPR vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSPR vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | -0.36% | -1.88% | 8.61% | 11.59% | -25.16% | 49.61% | 17.71% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | -0.94% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's -0.94% return.
RSPR
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- -4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.81%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.36%
BLDG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -8.62%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- -3.58%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPR vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSPR vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
RSPR
BLDG
RSPR vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPR | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 0.46 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 0.71 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.09 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 0.55 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 2.04 | -2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPR | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 0.46 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.15 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.38 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPR and BLDG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSPR vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than BLDG's 6.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 2.56% | 3.82% | 2.48% | 3.02% | 3.01% | 2.06% | 1.03% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 6.12% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RSPR vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and BLDG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPR | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.96% | -27.25% | -14.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -10.80% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.03% | -27.25% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.51% | -8.96% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -9.44% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 2.93% | +1.46% |
Volatility
RSPR vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 4.20%. This indicates that RSPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSPR | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 4.20% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 7.38% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 13.30% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 15.24% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 15.61% | +5.77% |