PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPN vs. PSCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPN vs. PSCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than PSCI's 18.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPN having a 14.49% annualized return and PSCI not far ahead at 14.98%.


RSPN

1D
0.53%
1M
-2.05%
6M
4.96%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
14.49%
ALL TIME*
11.48%

PSCI

1D
0.51%
1M
-2.40%
6M
8.12%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
29.94%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
14.98%
ALL TIME*
13.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$892.59K$880.26K$789.49K
$7.22M$5.89M$7.57M

RSPN vs. PSCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
11.17%13.84%17.63%22.32%-8.79%26.07%18.07%33.17%-13.23%23.22%
PSCI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF
18.13%13.50%16.68%31.64%-9.02%24.44%12.02%29.80%-13.20%17.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPN and PSCI is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.84

The correlation between RSPN and PSCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPN vs. PSCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPN
PSCI

Industrials

86.7%
77.2%

Technology

7.1%
11.1%

Basic Materials

3.6%
2.4%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
6.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.1%

Communication Services

-

0.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.6%

Energy

-

1.8%

Healthcare

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Industrials

RSPN
86.7%
PSCI
77.2%

Technology

RSPN
7.1%
PSCI
11.1%

Basic Materials

RSPN
3.6%
PSCI
2.4%

Utilities

RSPN
1.4%
PSCI

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPN
1.0%
PSCI
6.8%

Financial Services

RSPN
0.1%
PSCI
0.1%

Communication Services

RSPN

-

PSCI
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

RSPN

-

PSCI
0.6%

Energy

RSPN

-

PSCI
1.8%

Healthcare

RSPN

-

PSCI
0.5%

Real Estate

RSPN

-

PSCI
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPN vs. PSCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPN
RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCI
PSCI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PSCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPN vs. PSCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPNPSCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.86

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

6.11

-2.08

RSPN vs. PSCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPN Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the PSCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPN and PSCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPN vs. PSCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than PSCI's maximum drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and PSCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPNPSCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.61%

-45.55%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-14.88%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

-29.36%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-29.36%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-45.55%

+3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-4.96%

+2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-6.87%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

4.53%

-0.91%

Volatility

RSPN vs. PSCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is 4.54%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that RSPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPNPSCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

5.54%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

15.87%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

21.70%

-5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

22.92%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

25.25%

-4.91%

RSPN vs. PSCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPN vs. PSCI - Dividend Comparison

RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than PSCI's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF
1.34%1.56%0.65%0.72%0.87%0.69%0.59%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.74%1.02%
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
0.83%0.86%0.98%1.06%1.09%0.70%0.96%1.33%1.49%1.12%1.31%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPN and PSCI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCI has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to RSPN (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs PSCI's -45.55%.

On 10-year performance, PSCI leads with 14.98% vs 14.49% for RSPN. On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RSPN has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCI has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 14.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.

PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.83% for RSPN.

RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.29% for PSCI.

PSCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPN and PSCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer