RSPN vs. PSCI
RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) and PSCI (Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from Invesco - RSPN tracks the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index while PSCI tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPN returned 15.13%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for PSCI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCI.
Performance
RSPN vs. PSCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than PSCI's 20.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPN has underperformed PSCI with an annualized return of 15.13%, while PSCI has yielded a comparatively higher 16.02% annualized return.
RSPN
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
PSCI
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 45.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.51%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
RSPN vs. PSCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 11.03% | 13.84% | 17.63% | 22.32% | -8.79% | 26.07% | 18.07% | 33.17% | -13.23% | 23.22% |
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 20.86% | 13.50% | 16.68% | 31.64% | -9.02% | 24.44% | 12.02% | 29.80% | -13.20% | 17.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPN and PSCI is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.84 |
The correlation between RSPN and PSCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPN vs. PSCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPN
PSCI
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
RSPN
PSCI
Technology
RSPN
PSCI
Consumer Cyclical
RSPN
PSCI
Utilities
RSPN
PSCI
-
Financial Services
RSPN
PSCI
Basic Materials
RSPN
-
PSCI
Communication Services
RSPN
-
PSCI
Consumer Defensive
RSPN
-
PSCI
-
Energy
RSPN
-
PSCI
Healthcare
RSPN
-
PSCI
Real Estate
RSPN
-
PSCI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPN vs. PSCI — Risk / Return Rank
RSPN
PSCI
RSPN vs. PSCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPN | PSCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.06 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 10.40 | -4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPN vs. PSCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than PSCI's maximum drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and PSCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPN | PSCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.61% | -45.55% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -14.88% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.89% | -29.36% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -29.36% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | -45.55% | +3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | 0.00% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -6.89% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 4.37% | -0.77% |
Volatility
RSPN vs. PSCI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) have volatilities of 5.44% and 5.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPN | PSCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 5.39% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 15.69% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 21.40% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 22.99% | -4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 25.29% | -4.88% |
RSPN vs. PSCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCI's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPN vs. PSCI - Dividend Comparison
RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than PSCI's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 1.42% | 1.56% | 0.65% | 0.72% | 0.87% | 0.69% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.02% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 1.03% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPN and PSCI have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPN has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to PSCI (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs PSCI's -45.55%.
On 10-year performance, PSCI leads with 16.02% vs 15.13% for RSPN. On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCI has performed better with a 16.02% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.
PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.03% for RSPN.
RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.29% for PSCI.
PSCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPN and PSCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer