PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPN vs. PSCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPN vs. PSCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than PSCI's 20.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPN has underperformed PSCI with an annualized return of 15.13%, while PSCI has yielded a comparatively higher 16.02% annualized return.


RSPN

1D
0.31%
1M
4.48%
YTD
11.03%
6M
9.28%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
15.13%

PSCI

1D
0.55%
1M
7.77%
YTD
20.86%
6M
17.66%
1Y
45.26%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*
16.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPN vs. PSCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
11.03%13.84%17.63%22.32%-8.79%26.07%18.07%33.17%-13.23%23.22%
PSCI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF
20.86%13.50%16.68%31.64%-9.02%24.44%12.02%29.80%-13.20%17.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPN and PSCI is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.84

The correlation between RSPN and PSCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPN vs. PSCI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPN
PSCI

Industrials

92.1%
83.2%

Technology

3.8%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
5.2%

Utilities

1.6%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.8%

Healthcare

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Industrials

RSPN
92.1%
PSCI
83.2%

Technology

RSPN
3.8%
PSCI
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPN
2.4%
PSCI
5.2%

Utilities

RSPN
1.6%
PSCI

-

Financial Services

RSPN
0.1%
PSCI
0.1%

Basic Materials

RSPN

-

PSCI
0.9%

Communication Services

RSPN

-

PSCI
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

RSPN

-

PSCI

-

Energy

RSPN

-

PSCI
1.8%

Healthcare

RSPN

-

PSCI
0.5%

Real Estate

RSPN

-

PSCI
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPN vs. PSCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPN
RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCI
PSCI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PSCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPN vs. PSCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPNPSCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.06

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

10.40

-4.20

RSPN vs. PSCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPN Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the PSCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPN and PSCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPN vs. PSCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than PSCI's maximum drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and PSCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPNPSCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.61%

-45.55%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-14.88%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

-29.36%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-29.36%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-45.55%

+3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

0.00%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-6.89%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

4.37%

-0.77%

Volatility

RSPN vs. PSCI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) have volatilities of 5.44% and 5.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPNPSCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

5.39%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

15.69%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

21.40%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

22.99%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

25.29%

-4.88%

RSPN vs. PSCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPN vs. PSCI - Dividend Comparison

RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than PSCI's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF
1.42%1.56%0.65%0.72%0.87%0.69%0.59%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.74%1.02%
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
1.03%0.86%0.98%1.06%1.09%0.70%0.96%1.33%1.49%1.12%1.31%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPN and PSCI have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPN has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to PSCI (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs PSCI's -45.55%.

On 10-year performance, PSCI leads with 16.02% vs 15.13% for RSPN. On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCI has performed better with a 16.02% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.

PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.03% for RSPN.

RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.29% for PSCI.

PSCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPN and PSCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer