PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPN vs. FSUTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPN vs. FSUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly higher than FSUTX's 3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPN has outperformed FSUTX with an annualized return of 14.69%, while FSUTX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.35% annualized return.


RSPN

1D
0.52%
1M
2.43%
YTD
9.73%
6M
8.68%
1Y
20.14%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
14.69%

FSUTX

1D
0.51%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
3.35%
6M
3.29%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPN vs. FSUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
9.73%13.84%17.63%22.32%-8.79%26.07%18.07%33.17%-13.23%23.22%
FSUTX
Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio
3.35%16.19%28.76%-1.12%5.20%17.64%0.75%22.68%8.41%17.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPN and FSUTX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.48

The correlation between RSPN and FSUTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPN vs. FSUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPN
RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUTX
FSUTX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPN vs. FSUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPNFSUTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.52

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.23

3.41

+1.82

RSPN vs. FSUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPN Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the FSUTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPN and FSUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPN vs. FSUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, smaller than the maximum FSUTX drawdown of -66.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and FSUTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPNFSUTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.61%

-66.73%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-9.21%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

-15.20%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-20.15%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-37.61%

-4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-7.63%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-11.25%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

4.11%

-0.51%

Volatility

RSPN vs. FSUTX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPNFSUTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

5.96%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

13.09%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

16.35%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

17.42%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

19.40%

+0.99%

RSPN vs. FSUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FSUTX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPN vs. FSUTX - Dividend Comparison

RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than FSUTX's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSUTX
Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio
5.08%6.61%6.50%3.52%4.67%2.68%4.86%2.29%8.37%5.61%2.51%4.47%
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
0.80%0.86%0.98%1.06%1.09%0.70%0.96%1.33%1.49%1.12%1.31%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPN and FSUTX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSUTX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to RSPN (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs FSUTX's -66.73%.

RSPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPN and FSUTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer