RSPN vs. FMIMX
RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) and FMIMX (FMI Common Stock Fund) are both funds - RSPN is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while FMIMX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by FMI Funds. Over the past 10 years, RSPN returned 15.13%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for FMIMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPN charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for FMIMX.
Performance
RSPN vs. FMIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSPN having a 11.03% return and FMIMX slightly higher at 11.44%. Over the past 10 years, RSPN has outperformed FMIMX with an annualized return of 15.13%, while FMIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.33% annualized return.
RSPN
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
FMIMX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 14.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
RSPN vs. FMIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 11.03% | 13.84% | 17.63% | 22.32% | -8.79% | 26.07% | 18.07% | 33.17% | -13.23% | 23.22% |
FMIMX FMI Common Stock Fund | 11.44% | 2.12% | 10.38% | 24.85% | -5.95% | 30.52% | 5.79% | 24.80% | -8.77% | 13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPN and FMIMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RSPN and FMIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPN vs. FMIMX — Risk / Return Rank
RSPN
FMIMX
RSPN vs. FMIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and FMI Common Stock Fund (FMIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPN | FMIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.16 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.08 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 2.67 | +3.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPN vs. FMIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, roughly equal to the maximum FMIMX drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and FMIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPN | FMIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.61% | -59.09% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -13.80% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.89% | -21.31% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -21.31% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | -38.07% | -3.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -2.39% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -10.44% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 5.56% | -1.96% |
Volatility
RSPN vs. FMIMX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to FMI Common Stock Fund (FMIMX) at 4.57%. This indicates that RSPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPN | FMIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 4.57% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 12.52% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 17.27% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 18.67% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 19.27% | +1.14% |
RSPN vs. FMIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIMX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPN vs. FMIMX - Dividend Comparison
RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FMIMX's 11.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIMX FMI Common Stock Fund | 11.88% | 13.24% | 2.01% | 2.84% | 6.65% | 12.44% | 0.76% | 4.93% | 10.17% | 11.82% | 4.92% | 10.77% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 1.03% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPN and FMIMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPN has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to FMIMX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs FMIMX's -59.09%.
RSPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPN and FMIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer