RSPH vs. TRUH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. RSPH is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RSPH charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.

Performance

RSPH vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RSPH

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 8.20%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 1Y: 25.63%
• 3Y*: 6.05%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: 8.73%
• ALL TIME*: 10.98%

TRUH

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -0.28%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	$2.33M	$3.63M	$4.82M
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	$23.58K	$32.63K	$24.16K

RSPH vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	14.76%
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPH and TRUH is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

RSPH vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPH

RSPH Risk / Return Rank: 66
RSPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RSPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RSPH Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RSPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RSPH Martin Ratio Rank: 51

TRUH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPH vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPH	TRUH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	—	—

Drawdowns

RSPH vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPH drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPH and TRUH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPH	TRUH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.49%	-4.51%	-35.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-2.75%	+1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-1.64%	-4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSPH	TRUH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.35%	17.62%	-1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	17.62%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.79%	17.62%	+0.17%

RSPH vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPH has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPH vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison

RSPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	0.67%	0.70%	0.71%	0.66%	0.64%	0.50%	0.51%	0.54%	0.53%	0.47%	0.48%	0.49%
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPH and TRUH in my portfolio?

RSPH and TRUH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSPH or TRUH?

On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPH or TRUH?

TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPH or TRUH?

RSPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.

What is the main difference between RSPH and TRUH?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPH and 0.10% for TRUH.