RSPH vs. IHI
RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) and IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - RSPH tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC while IHI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPH returned 8.68%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for IHI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPH charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IHI.
Performance
RSPH vs. IHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPH achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than IHI's -20.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPH having a 8.68% annualized return and IHI not far ahead at 8.88%.
RSPH
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 12.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
IHI
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- -20.78%
- 6M
- -21.40%
- 1Y
- -18.62%
- 3Y*
- -3.57%
- 5Y*
- -3.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
RSPH vs. IHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | -0.02% | 9.52% | -0.94% | 3.95% | -9.40% | 23.19% | 18.83% | 25.48% | -0.66% | 23.70% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -20.78% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPH and IHI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.85 |
The correlation between RSPH and IHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPH vs. IHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPH
IHI
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
RSPH
IHI
Financial Services
RSPH
IHI
-
Basic Materials
RSPH
-
IHI
-
Communication Services
RSPH
-
IHI
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPH
-
IHI
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPH
-
IHI
-
Energy
RSPH
-
IHI
-
Industrials
RSPH
-
IHI
Real Estate
RSPH
-
IHI
-
Technology
RSPH
-
IHI
-
Utilities
RSPH
-
IHI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPH vs. IHI — Risk / Return Rank
RSPH
IHI
RSPH vs. IHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPH | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.84 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.72 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.72 | -1.63 | +4.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPH vs. IHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPH drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, smaller than the maximum IHI drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPH and IHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPH | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -49.65% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -26.11% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.13% | -26.64% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -33.12% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.44% | -33.25% | +2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | -25.20% | +20.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -8.36% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 11.44% | -7.01% |
Volatility
RSPH vs. IHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) is 5.08%, while iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that RSPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPH | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 6.75% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 13.82% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 17.62% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 19.09% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 19.82% | -2.09% |
RSPH vs. IHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPH has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPH vs. IHI - Dividend Comparison
RSPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than IHI's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.49% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 0.73% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPH and IHI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to RSPH (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPH dropped -40.49% vs IHI's -49.65%.
On 10-year performance, IHI leads with 8.88% vs 8.68% for RSPH. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, RSPH has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IHI has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPH.
RSPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.49% for IHI.
RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC, while IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPH and 0.38% for IHI.
RSPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPH and IHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer