RSPH vs. EDOC
RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) and EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - RSPH tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC while EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPH returned 3.14%/yr vs -13.37%/yr for EDOC. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPH charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for EDOC.
Performance
RSPH vs. EDOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPH achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than EDOC's -7.90% return.
RSPH
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.98%
EDOC
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- 6M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -12.88%
- 3Y*
- -8.61%
- 5Y*
- -13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $245.64K | $221.54K | $214.19K | |
| $2.33M | $3.63M | $4.82M |
RSPH vs. EDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 9.56% | 9.52% | -0.94% | 3.95% | -9.40% | 23.19% | 8.60% |
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -7.90% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPH and EDOC is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between RSPH and EDOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPH vs. EDOC — Risk / Return Rank
RSPH
EDOC
RSPH vs. EDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPH | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.92 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | -0.45 | +2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | -0.82 | +6.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPH vs. EDOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPH drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, smaller than the maximum EDOC drawdown of -65.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPH and EDOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPH | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -65.76% | +25.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -30.71% | +19.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.13% | -34.56% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -59.14% | +37.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -60.24% | +59.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -43.48% | +37.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 16.87% | -12.60% |
Volatility
RSPH vs. EDOC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) is 5.90%, while Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that RSPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPH | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 6.34% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 17.24% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.35% | 22.70% | -6.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 26.63% | -10.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 26.25% | -8.46% |
RSPH vs. EDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPH has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EDOC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPH vs. EDOC - Dividend Comparison
RSPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than EDOC's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.27% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 0.67% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPH and EDOC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to RSPH (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPH dropped -40.49% vs EDOC's -65.76%.
On 5-year performance, RSPH leads with 3.14% vs -13.37% for EDOC. On fees, RSPH is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPH has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSPH has performed better with a 3.14% return vs -13.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPH is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.
RSPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.27% for EDOC.
RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC, while EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPH and 0.68% for EDOC.
RSPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPH and EDOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer