RSPG vs. PBOG
RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - RSPG tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index while PBOG tracks the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
RSPG vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 25.57% return, which is significantly higher than PBOG's 20.33% return.
RSPG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 25.57%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- 1Y
- 34.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPG vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 25.57% | 0.20% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 20.33% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPG and PBOG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPG vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
RSPG
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPG vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPG | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPG vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPG | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.98% | -16.46% | -63.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.78% | -15.19% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -3.86% | -21.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPG vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPG | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.09% | 23.95% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 23.95% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.53% | 23.95% | +9.58% |
RSPG vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPG vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than PBOG's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 2.11% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, RSPG and PBOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.
RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.14% for PBOG.
RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPG and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for RSPG and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer