RSPG vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, while MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS. RSPG is passively managed, while MLPI is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

RSPG vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 25.57% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 19.61% return.

RSPG

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -7.91%
• YTD: 25.57%
• 6M: 25.75%
• 1Y: 34.94%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 19.92%
• 10Y*: 8.92%

MLPI

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 6M: 18.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPG vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	25.57%	-0.06%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	19.61%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPG and MLPI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

RSPG vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 48
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 47

MLPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPG vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPG	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.56	—	—

Drawdowns

RSPG vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPG	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.98%	-5.38%	-74.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.78%	-2.18%	-9.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.42%	-1.49%	-23.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSPG	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.09%	13.05%	+9.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.25%	13.05%	+15.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.53%	13.05%	+20.48%

RSPG vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPG vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than MLPI's 7.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	7.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	2.11%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPG and MLPI in my portfolio?

RSPG and MLPI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSPG or MLPI?

On fees, RSPG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPG or MLPI?

RSPG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPG or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 2.11% for RSPG.

What is the main difference between RSPG and MLPI?

RSPG is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPG and 0.68% for MLPI.