RSPG vs. ENFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR).
RSPG and ENFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. Both RSPG and ENFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPG or ENFR.
Key characteristics
| RSPG | ENFR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.35% | 41.14% |
| 1Y Return | 16.17% | 49.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 20.52% | 21.33% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.21% | 16.77% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.24% | 5.77% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.85 | 3.85 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.24 | 5.25 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.68 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.16 | 8.98 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.67 | 31.72 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.90% | 1.54% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.62% | 12.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -79.98% | -68.28% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.44% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPG and ENFR is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSPG vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 41.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPG has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 3.24%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPG vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPG vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPG vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than ENFR's 3.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 2.52% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% | 1.97% | 0.98% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.28% | 5.48% | 5.22% | 7.86% | 7.58% | 5.82% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% | 2.15% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
RSPG vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and ENFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPG vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 3.99%. This indicates that RSPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.