RSPG vs. ENFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR).
RSPG and ENFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. Both RSPG and ENFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPG or ENFR.
Correlation
The correlation between RSPG and ENFR is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSPG vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RSPG:
0.81
ENFR:
3.33
RSPG:
1.17
ENFR:
4.16
RSPG:
1.15
ENFR:
1.58
RSPG:
1.03
ENFR:
5.04
RSPG:
2.34
ENFR:
20.20
RSPG:
6.63%
ENFR:
2.47%
RSPG:
19.31%
ENFR:
15.01%
RSPG:
-79.98%
ENFR:
-68.28%
RSPG:
-5.18%
ENFR:
-4.61%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than ENFR's 4.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPG has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 3.98%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 6.85% annualized return.
RSPG
6.27%
-3.53%
3.26%
12.46%
17.19%
3.98%
ENFR
4.48%
-1.14%
19.80%
46.05%
17.04%
6.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPG vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPG vs. ENFR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RSPG
ENFR
RSPG vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPG vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than ENFR's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 2.29% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% | 1.97% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.30% | 4.40% | 5.48% | 5.22% | 7.86% | 7.58% | 5.82% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
RSPG vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and ENFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPG vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) have volatilities of 6.64% and 6.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.