PortfoliosLab logo
RSPG vs. ENFR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSPG and ENFR is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RSPG vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSPG:

-0.30

ENFR:

1.48

Sortino Ratio

RSPG:

-0.27

ENFR:

1.83

Omega Ratio

RSPG:

0.96

ENFR:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

RSPG:

-0.40

ENFR:

1.81

Martin Ratio

RSPG:

-1.11

ENFR:

6.25

Ulcer Index

RSPG:

8.37%

ENFR:

4.52%

Daily Std Dev

RSPG:

27.78%

ENFR:

19.79%

Max Drawdown

RSPG:

-79.98%

ENFR:

-68.28%

Current Drawdown

RSPG:

-15.72%

ENFR:

-6.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPG has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 3.11%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.


RSPG

YTD

-5.55%

1M

1.66%

6M

-14.09%

1Y

-10.18%

3Y*

0.79%

5Y*

24.49%

10Y*

3.11%

ENFR

YTD

2.87%

1M

2.91%

6M

-3.22%

1Y

27.07%

3Y*

16.40%

5Y*

24.14%

10Y*

6.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF

RSPG vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSPG vs. ENFR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSPG is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSPG is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSPG is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSPG is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSPG is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSPG is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ENFR is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ENFR is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ENFR is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ENFR is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ENFR is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ENFR is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSPG vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RSPG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPG and ENFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RSPG vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than ENFR's 4.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
2.72%2.43%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%1.97%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.54%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%2.15%

Drawdowns

RSPG vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and ENFR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RSPG vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 3.71%. This indicates that RSPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...