RSPG vs. DRLL
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL).
RSPG and DRLL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. DRLL is a passively managed fund by Strive that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. Both RSPG and DRLL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RSPG vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSPG vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 33.74% | 7.01% | 6.09% | 4.49% | 17.21% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 33.59% | 7.74% | 0.02% | -1.84% | 16.56% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RSPG having a 33.74% return and DRLL slightly lower at 33.59%.
RSPG
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 33.74%
- 6M
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 31.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 23.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
DRLL
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 33.59%
- 6M
- 33.26%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPG vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSPG vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
RSPG
DRLL
RSPG vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.57 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.61 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 4.63 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.63 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPG and DRLL is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSPG vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than DRLL's 2.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.95% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.29% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RSPG vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and DRLL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.98% | -23.73% | -56.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.05% | -19.37% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -6.47% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.63% | -7.95% | -17.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 6.75% | +0.80% |
Volatility
RSPG vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is 6.30%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that RSPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSPG | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 7.17% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 15.33% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.69% | 26.41% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.51% | 23.49% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.58% | 23.49% | +10.09% |