RSPG vs. DFCA
RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) and DFCA (Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, while DFCA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional. RSPG is passively managed, while DFCA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSPG returned 14.57%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for DFCA. Their -0.10 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RSPG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFCA.
Performance
RSPG vs. DFCA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 33.76% return, which is significantly higher than DFCA's 0.32% return.
RSPG
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 21.58%
- YTD
- 33.76%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 25.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
DFCA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 3.36%
- 3Y*
- 2.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37M | $2.33M | $2.88M | |
| $9.32M | $9.11M | $10.82M |
RSPG vs. DFCA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 33.76% | 7.01% | 6.09% | 13.17% |
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF | 0.32% | 2.99% | 1.49% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPG and DFCA is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023 | -0.10 |
The correlation between RSPG and DFCA shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPG vs. DFCA — Risk / Return Rank
RSPG
DFCA
RSPG vs. DFCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPG | DFCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 1.91 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | 5.53 | +2.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPG vs. DFCA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than DFCA's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and DFCA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPG | DFCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.98% | -3.28% | -76.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.72% | -1.77% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.06% | -3.28% | -19.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -1.26% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.32% | -0.69% | -24.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 0.61% | +4.80% |
Volatility
RSPG vs. DFCA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) at 0.69%. This indicates that RSPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPG | DFCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 0.69% | +5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 1.44% | +15.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 1.82% | +20.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 2.46% | +25.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.43% | 2.46% | +30.97% |
RSPG vs. DFCA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DFCA's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPG vs. DFCA - Dividend Comparison
RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than DFCA's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF | 2.77% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.98% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPG and DFCA have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPG has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to DFCA (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPG dropped -79.98% vs DFCA's -3.28%.
On 3-year performance, RSPG leads with 14.57% vs 2.52% for DFCA. On fees, DFCA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DFCA has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RSPG has performed better with a 14.57% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFCA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.
DFCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.98% for RSPG.
RSPG is categorized as Energy Equities, while DFCA is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPG and 0.19% for DFCA.
RSPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPG and DFCA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer