RSPF vs. PBEU
RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) and PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - RSPF tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC while PBEU tracks the BITA European Banks Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBEU.
Performance
RSPF vs. PBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPF achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than PBEU's 6.67% return.
RSPF
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 6M
- -2.72%
- 1Y
- 2.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
PBEU
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPF vs. PBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF | -5.25% | 4.37% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 6.67% | 11.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPF and PBEU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPF vs. PBEU — Risk / Return Rank
RSPF
PBEU
RSPF vs. PBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPF | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPF | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.45 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
RSPF vs. PBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than PBEU's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and PBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPF | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.32% | -17.26% | -64.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.99% | -2.18% | -5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.04% | -4.23% | -14.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPF vs. PBEU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPF | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 27.88% | -12.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 27.88% | -8.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 27.88% | -4.97% |
RSPF vs. PBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PBEU's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPF vs. PBEU - Dividend Comparison
RSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than PBEU's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF | 1.70% | 1.55% | 1.65% | 2.16% | 1.95% | 1.56% | 2.24% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 1.28% | 37.55% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPF and PBEU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBEU is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBEU is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.
RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.
RSPF tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC, while PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPF and 0.13% for PBEU.
Find the right allocation for RSPF and PBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer