RSPE vs. SPDV
RSPE (Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSPE returned 16.43%/yr vs 16.86%/yr for SPDV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SPDV.
Performance
RSPE vs. SPDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPE achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than SPDV's 14.19% return.
RSPE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 6M
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 27.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPE vs. SPDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPE Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 12.08% | 14.58% | 10.87% | 13.97% | -12.21% | 1.37% |
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 14.19% | 10.90% | 14.40% | 5.45% | -2.27% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPE and SPDV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RSPE and SPDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPE vs. SPDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPE
SPDV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
RSPE
SPDV
Financial Services
RSPE
SPDV
Industrials
RSPE
SPDV
Healthcare
RSPE
SPDV
Consumer Cyclical
RSPE
SPDV
Consumer Defensive
RSPE
SPDV
Real Estate
RSPE
SPDV
Basic Materials
RSPE
SPDV
Communication Services
RSPE
SPDV
Utilities
RSPE
SPDV
Energy
RSPE
-
SPDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPE vs. SPDV — Risk / Return Rank
RSPE
SPDV
RSPE vs. SPDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPE | SPDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 2.26 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 3.35 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 4.74 | -1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 13.66 | -1.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPE | SPDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.26 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.46 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
RSPE vs. SPDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum SPDV drawdown of -43.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPE and SPDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPE | SPDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.93% | -43.81% | +20.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -5.80% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.58% | -18.62% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.62% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -6.57% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.01% | +0.25% |
Volatility
RSPE vs. SPDV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) at 2.76%. This indicates that RSPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPE | SPDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.76% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 8.16% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 12.18% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 16.30% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 20.31% | -3.56% |
RSPE vs. SPDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPDV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPE vs. SPDV - Dividend Comparison
RSPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than SPDV's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPE Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 1.91% | 1.83% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 3.31% | 3.85% | 3.54% | 3.95% | 3.73% | 3.08% | 3.90% | 3.54% | 3.63% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPE and SPDV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPE has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SPDV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPE dropped -22.93% vs SPDV's -43.81%.
On 3-year performance, SPDV leads with 16.86% vs 16.43% for RSPE. On fees, RSPE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPDV has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.
SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.47% for RSPE.
RSPE is categorized as S&P 500, while SPDV is Dividend. RSPE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Advisors Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSPE and 0.29% for SPDV.
SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPE and SPDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer