PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RSPD vs. TRUD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RSPD vs. TRUD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) and TRUD (VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RSPD is passively managed, while TRUD is actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TRUD.

Performance

RSPD vs. TRUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than TRUD's 2.72% return.

RSPD

1D
1.06%
1M
1.79%
6M
-2.22%
YTD
1.19%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
8.14%
ALL TIME*
8.32%

TRUD

1D
2.51%
1M
3.37%
6M
0.22%
YTD
2.72%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

RSPD

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
$3.23M$2.98M$3.50M

TRUD

VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF
$4.26M$2.53M$1.76M

RSPD vs. TRUD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF		1.19%0.45%
TRUD
VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF		2.72%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and TRUD is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.68

RSPD vs. TRUD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RSPD
TRUD

Consumer Cyclical

93.6%
37.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
0.1%

Technology

2.2%
0.1%

Industrials

1.8%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.1%
61.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPD
93.6%
TRUD
37.9%

Communication Services

RSPD
2.4%
TRUD
0.1%

Technology

RSPD
2.2%
TRUD
0.1%

Industrials

RSPD
1.8%
TRUD
0.0%

Financial Services

RSPD
0.1%
TRUD
61.9%

Basic Materials

RSPD

-

TRUD

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPD

-

TRUD

-

Energy

RSPD

-

TRUD

-

Healthcare

RSPD

-

TRUD

-

Real Estate

RSPD

-

TRUD

-

Utilities

RSPD

-

TRUD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF

Often compared with RSPD:
RSPD vs. RSPRSPD vs. RSPTRSPD vs. XLYRSPD vs. VTIRSPD vs. SPHQRSPD vs. VCRRSPD vs. FDIS
Often compared with TRUD:
TRUD vs. GXPDTRUD vs. TMHTRUD vs. IYCTRUD vs. XLYTRUD vs. MOATTRUD vs. RKNGTRUD vs. DVXY

Return for Risk

RSPD vs. TRUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
RSPD
RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
TRUD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPD vs. TRUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RSPDTRUDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.32

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.64

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

—

—

RSPD vs. TRUD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. TRUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than TRUD's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and TRUD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RSPDTRUDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.00%

-15.96%

-52.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-2.34%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-4.75%

-5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

—

—

Volatility

RSPD vs. TRUD - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RSPDTRUDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

22.33%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

22.33%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.13%

22.33%

+0.80%

RSPD vs. TRUD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUD's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPD vs. TRUD - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than TRUD's 0.47% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF		0.86%1.08%0.84%1.09%0.99%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%
TRUD
VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF		0.47%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RSPD and TRUD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.47% for TRUD.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.16% for TRUD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPD and TRUD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer