RSPD vs. IOO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO).

RSPD and IOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. IOO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2000. Both RSPD and IOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RSPD vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSPD vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	-5.92%	7.98%	13.37%	22.55%	-24.03%	28.75%	11.43%	25.88%	-8.79%	15.04%
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	-4.50%	27.02%	26.54%	27.71%	-16.34%	26.03%	18.61%	30.01%	-6.22%	23.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's -4.50% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPD has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 7.36%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.

RSPD

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -9.04%
• YTD: -5.92%
• 6M: -6.83%
• 1Y: 8.38%
• 3Y*: 9.02%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: 7.36%

IOO

• 1D: 3.46%
• 1M: -5.18%
• YTD: -4.50%
• 6M: 1.16%
• 1Y: 26.95%
• 3Y*: 21.47%
• 5Y*: 14.29%
• 10Y*: 15.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPD vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSPD and IOO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

RSPD

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

IOO

iShares Global 100 ETF

Return for Risk

RSPD vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPD

RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 26
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 24
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 26

IOO

IOO Risk / Return Rank: 83
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPD vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPD	IOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.41	-1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	2.09	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.31	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	2.18	-1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.98	10.38	-8.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPD vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and IOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPD	IOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	1.41	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.85	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.85	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.36	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and IOO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RSPD vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than IOO's 0.96% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.05%	1.08%	0.84%	1.09%	0.99%	0.53%	0.81%	1.59%	1.67%	1.45%	1.27%	1.37%
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	0.96%	0.92%	1.08%	1.49%	2.00%	1.53%	1.49%	2.02%	2.54%	2.23%	2.75%	2.89%

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and IOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPD	IOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.00%	-55.85%	-12.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.57%	-12.40%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	-23.52%	-10.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.00%	-31.43%	-16.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.61%	-6.82%	-3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.72%	-11.34%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.65%	2.61%	+2.04%

Volatility

RSPD vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) have volatilities of 6.40% and 6.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPD	IOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	6.26%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	10.69%	+2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.52%	19.22%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.01%	16.97%	+5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.02%	17.74%	+5.28%