PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPD vs. IBUY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPD vs. IBUY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly higher than IBUY's -9.26% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPD has underperformed IBUY with an annualized return of 8.01%, while IBUY has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.


RSPD

1D
-1.07%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
-2.73%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
8.01%

IBUY

1D
-0.83%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-9.26%
6M
-8.03%
1Y
-0.11%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
-10.95%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPD vs. IBUY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
-3.92%7.98%13.37%22.55%-24.03%28.75%11.43%25.88%-8.79%15.04%
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
-9.26%15.26%20.14%38.01%-55.71%-22.99%123.79%28.47%-1.93%50.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and IBUY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.72

The correlation between RSPD and IBUY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPD vs. IBUY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPD
IBUY

Consumer Cyclical

93.8%
71.7%

Technology

2.2%
5.1%

Communication Services

2.0%
5.8%

Industrials

1.9%
5.1%

Financial Services

0.1%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

4.7%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPD
93.8%
IBUY
71.7%

Technology

RSPD
2.2%
IBUY
5.1%

Communication Services

RSPD
2.0%
IBUY
5.8%

Industrials

RSPD
1.9%
IBUY
5.1%

Financial Services

RSPD
0.1%
IBUY
4.2%

Basic Materials

RSPD

-

IBUY

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPD

-

IBUY
2.5%

Energy

RSPD

-

IBUY

-

Healthcare

RSPD

-

IBUY
4.7%

Real Estate

RSPD

-

IBUY
0.8%

Utilities

RSPD

-

IBUY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPD vs. IBUY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPD
RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IBUY
IBUY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IBUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBUY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IBUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBUY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPD vs. IBUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPDIBUYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

-0.01

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.71

0.14

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.02

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

0.03

+0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.25

0.06

+1.19

RSPD vs. IBUY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the IBUY Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and IBUY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPDIBUYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

-0.01

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

-0.34

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.36

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.36

-0.02

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. IBUY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, smaller than the maximum IBUY drawdown of -73.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and IBUY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPDIBUYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.00%

-73.00%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-23.23%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

-28.87%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-71.15%

+36.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

-73.00%

+25.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.70%

-51.40%

+42.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-29.64%

+18.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

10.45%

-4.96%

Volatility

RSPD vs. IBUY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) have volatilities of 5.79% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPDIBUYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

5.59%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

15.60%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

21.44%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.10%

32.09%

-9.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

29.16%

-6.05%

RSPD vs. IBUY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IBUY's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPD vs. IBUY - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than IBUY's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBUY
Amplify Online Retail ETF
0.12%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.54%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.02%1.08%0.84%1.09%0.99%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPD and IBUY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPD has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to IBUY (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPD dropped -68.00% vs IBUY's -73.00%.

On 10-year performance, IBUY leads with 10.58% vs 8.01% for RSPD. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IBUY has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IBUY has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.

RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.65% for IBUY.

RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPD and IBUY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer