RSPD vs. GXPD
RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) and GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC while GXPD tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPD.
Performance
RSPD vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly higher than GXPD's -4.42% return.
RSPD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 6M
- -4.33%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPD vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.06% | 1.75% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -4.42% | 5.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPD and GXPD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPD vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank
RSPD
GXPD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPD vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPD | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPD vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and GXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPD | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.00% | -16.61% | -51.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -8.86% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -4.40% | -6.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPD vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPD | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 20.38% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 20.38% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 20.38% | +2.74% |
RSPD vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPD vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison
RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than GXPD's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.89% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPD and GXPD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.
RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.20% for GXPD.
RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.15% for GXPD.
Find the right allocation for RSPD and GXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer