PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPD vs. GXPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPD vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a -4.30% return, which is significantly lower than GXPD's -0.87% return.


RSPD

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.43%
YTD
-4.30%
6M
-3.84%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
7.97%

GXPD

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPD vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and GXPD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPD vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPD
RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPD vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPDGXPDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.96

RSPD vs. GXPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPDGXPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.26

+0.07

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and GXPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPDGXPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.00%

-16.61%

-51.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-5.48%

-3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-4.27%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

Volatility

RSPD vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPDGXPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

20.01%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.10%

20.01%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

20.01%

+3.10%

RSPD vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPD vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than GXPD's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPD
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.03%1.08%0.84%1.09%0.99%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPD and GXPD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.

RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.15% for GXPD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPD and GXPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer