RSPC vs. SOXQ
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPC returned -0.41%/yr vs 28.65%/yr for SOXQ. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
RSPC vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -10.27% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 59.97% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -10.27%
- 1Y
- -2.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.11%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- 6M
- 41.59%
- YTD
- 59.97%
- 1Y
- 105.49%
- 3Y*
- 44.02%
- 5Y*
- 28.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $480.30K | $640.18K | $573.12K | |
| $219.33M | $233.61M | $278.30M |
RSPC vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -10.27% | 18.44% | 17.98% | 17.92% | -29.00% | -7.71% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 59.97% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and SOXQ is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.46 |
The correlation between RSPC and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPC vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPC
SOXQ
Communication Services
-
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
RSPC
SOXQ
-
Technology
RSPC
SOXQ
Financial Services
RSPC
SOXQ
Basic Materials
RSPC
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPC
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPC
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
RSPC
-
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
RSPC
-
SOXQ
-
Industrials
RSPC
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
RSPC
-
SOXQ
-
Utilities
RSPC
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
SOXQ
RSPC vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.36 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.61 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 15.05 | -15.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -46.01% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -28.56% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -39.36% | +23.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.73% | -46.01% | +8.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.04% | -22.64% | +9.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -12.92% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.14% | 6.83% | +0.31% |
Volatility
RSPC vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 5.56%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 17.19%. This indicates that RSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 17.19% | -11.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 37.70% | -26.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 43.52% | -28.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 38.28% | -19.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 37.93% | -17.22% |
RSPC vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than SOXQ's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.83% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and SOXQ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (17.19%) compared to RSPC (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 28.65% vs -0.41% for RSPC. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RSPC has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 28.65% return vs -0.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.
RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.32% for SOXQ.
RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer