PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPC vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -10.64% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 90.62% return.


RSPC

1D
0.77%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
-10.64%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
-2.95%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
-0.76%
10Y*

SOXQ

1D
-7.82%
1M
10.55%
YTD
90.62%
6M
87.99%
1Y
158.27%
3Y*
57.61%
5Y*
34.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
-10.64%18.44%17.98%17.92%-29.00%-7.71%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
90.62%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%25.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPC and SOXQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPC and SOXQ has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPC
SOXQ

Communication Services

95.2%

-

Technology

4.8%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

RSPC
95.2%
SOXQ

-

Technology

RSPC
4.8%
SOXQ
100.0%

Financial Services

RSPC
0.0%
SOXQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

RSPC

-

SOXQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPC

-

SOXQ

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPC

-

SOXQ

-

Energy

RSPC

-

SOXQ

-

Healthcare

RSPC

-

SOXQ

-

Industrials

RSPC

-

SOXQ

-

Real Estate

RSPC

-

SOXQ

-

Utilities

RSPC

-

SOXQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPC vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPC
RSPC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
RSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPCSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.58

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

10.22

-10.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

36.68

-37.18

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 4.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPC and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPCSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.03%

-46.01%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.05%

-15.59%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-39.36%

+25.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.96%

-46.01%

+8.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.39%

-7.82%

-5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-12.87%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

4.33%

+1.52%

Volatility

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 4.67%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 22.04%. This indicates that RSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPCSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

22.04%

-17.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

32.49%

-22.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

38.78%

-24.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

37.34%

-18.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

37.24%

-16.50%

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPC vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than SOXQ's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
1.84%1.66%1.03%0.98%1.45%1.10%1.05%0.90%0.24%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPC and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (22.04%) compared to RSPC (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 34.04% vs -0.76% for RSPC. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RSPC has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 34.04% return vs -0.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.

RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.27% for SOXQ.

RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPC and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer