RSPC vs. DVXC
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and DVXC (WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF) are both Communications Equities funds - RSPC tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index while DVXC tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLC Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXC.
Performance
RSPC vs. DVXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -5.64% return, which is significantly higher than DVXC's -11.14% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -5.64%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- 5.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
DVXC
- 1D
- -3.67%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -11.14%
- 6M
- -7.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPC vs. DVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -5.64% | 4.96% |
DVXC WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF | -11.14% | 14.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and DVXC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. DVXC — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
DVXC
RSPC vs. DVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF (DVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPC | DVXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPC | DVXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.09 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. DVXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than DVXC's maximum drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and DVXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | DVXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -21.52% | -16.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -14.50% | +5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -6.86% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPC vs. DVXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | DVXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 25.97% | -12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 25.97% | -7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 25.97% | -5.20% |
RSPC vs. DVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXC's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. DVXC - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while DVXC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXC WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and DVXC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSPC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSPC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXC.
RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.00% for DVXC.
RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while DVXC tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLC Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.89% for DVXC.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and DVXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer