PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPC vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPC vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -5.64% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.


RSPC

1D
-1.68%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-5.64%
6M
-2.98%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*

DBO

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
80.66%
6M
78.46%
1Y
78.18%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPC vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
-5.64%18.44%17.98%17.92%-29.00%14.55%22.14%21.35%-11.38%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
80.66%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-18.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPC and DBO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.18

The correlation between RSPC and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPC vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPC
DBO

Communication Services

94.8%

-

Technology

5.1%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
116.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

RSPC
94.8%
DBO

-

Technology

RSPC
5.1%
DBO

-

Financial Services

RSPC
0.0%
DBO
116.0%

Basic Materials

RSPC

-

DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPC

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPC

-

DBO

-

Energy

RSPC

-

DBO

-

Healthcare

RSPC

-

DBO

-

Industrials

RSPC

-

DBO

-

Real Estate

RSPC

-

DBO

-

Utilities

RSPC

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPC vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPC
RSPC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPC vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPCDBODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

2.28

-1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.62

2.88

-2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

4.62

-4.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.95

9.43

-8.48

RSPC vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPC and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPCDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

2.28

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.49

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.02

+0.32

Drawdowns

RSPC vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPCDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.03%

-90.18%

+52.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-18.19%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-28.20%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.96%

-37.68%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.55%

-52.46%

+43.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.71%

-62.25%

+49.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

8.92%

-3.70%

Volatility

RSPC vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 3.53%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that RSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPCDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

13.25%

-9.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

28.15%

-19.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

34.54%

-21.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

32.28%

-13.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

31.78%

-11.01%

RSPC vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPC vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than DBO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.94%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
1.72%1.66%1.03%0.98%1.45%1.10%1.05%0.90%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPC and DBO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to RSPC (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.57% vs 0.54% for RSPC. On fees, RSPC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPC has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 0.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.72% for RSPC.

RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPC and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer