PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPA vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPA vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return.


RSPA

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.76%
6M
8.20%
YTD
10.74%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPA vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSPA and UUP is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024

-0.18

The correlation between RSPA and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPA vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPA
RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPA vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPAUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.28

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

6.26

+4.83

RSPA vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPA and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPA vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPAUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-22.19%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.21%

-3.65%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-1.26%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-8.88%

+6.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.33%

+0.22%

Volatility

RSPA vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that RSPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPAUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

1.45%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

4.34%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

6.03%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.80%

7.22%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.80%

6.90%

+5.90%

RSPA vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPA vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPA
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
8.87%9.14%4.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPA and UUP have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPA has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPA dropped -15.37% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 1-year performance, RSPA leads with 17.16% vs 8.28% for UUP. On fees, RSPA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSPA has performed better with a 17.16% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

RSPA has the higher dividend yield at 8.87%, compared with 3.25% for UUP.

RSPA is categorized as S&P 500, while UUP is Currency. RSPA tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RSPA and 0.75% for UUP.

RSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPA and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer