RSPA vs. SPHD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RSPA (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPA is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RSPA returned 20.26% vs 15.99% for SPHD. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.

Performance

RSPA vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 12.76% return.

RSPA

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: 8.62%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 1Y: 20.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.17%

SPHD

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 7.84%
• YTD: 12.76%
• 1Y: 15.99%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 8.21%
• 10Y*: 7.28%
• ALL TIME*: 9.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	$11.34M	$11.17M	$10.07M
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	$46.06M	$45.99M	$42.71M

RSPA vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	12.02%	11.07%	3.51%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	12.76%	3.41%	6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPA and SPHD is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024	0.60

The correlation between RSPA and SPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSPA vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPA

RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 87
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 87
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

SPHD

SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 55
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPA vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPA	SPHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.36	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.06	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.23	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	2.19	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.38	5.46	+7.92

RSPA vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPA Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPA and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPA vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and SPHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPA	SPHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.37%	-41.39%	+26.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.21%	-7.33%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.83%	+1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-4.66%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	2.94%	-1.42%

Volatility

RSPA vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) is 2.01%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that RSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPA	SPHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	4.36%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.75%	9.03%	-2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.47%	11.80%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.67%	14.24%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.67%	17.67%	-5.00%

RSPA vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPA vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, more than SPHD's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	8.88%	9.14%	4.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	4.54%	4.02%	3.41%	4.48%	3.89%	3.45%	4.89%	4.07%	4.40%	3.14%	3.83%	3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPA and SPHD in my portfolio?

RSPA and SPHD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPA or SPHD?

SPHD has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to RSPA (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPA dropped -15.37% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

Which ETF is better, RSPA or SPHD?

On 1-year performance, RSPA leads with 20.26% vs 15.99% for SPHD. On fees, RSPA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RSPA has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPA or SPHD?

Over the 1-year period, RSPA has performed better with a 20.26% return vs 15.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPA or SPHD?

RSPA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPA or SPHD?

RSPA has the higher dividend yield at 8.88%, compared with 4.54% for SPHD.

What is the main difference between RSPA and SPHD?

RSPA is categorized as S&P 500, while SPHD is Dividend. RSPA tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RSPA and 0.30% for SPHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.