PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPA vs. SPDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSPA vs. SPDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSPA vs. SPDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RSPA
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
0.42%11.07%3.68%
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
8.31%10.90%4.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPDV's 8.31% return.


RSPA

1D
1.49%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
0.42%
6M
2.58%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPDV

1D
0.78%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
8.31%
6M
9.18%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPA vs. SPDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSPA and SPDV have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Return for Risk

RSPA vs. SPDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPA
RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPA vs. SPDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPASPDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.08

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.58

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.44

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.32

6.09

-0.77

RSPA vs. SPDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the SPDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPA and SPDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPASPDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.08

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.43

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between RSPA and SPDV is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RSPA vs. SPDV - Dividend Comparison

RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, more than SPDV's 3.50% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPA
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
9.37%9.14%4.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.50%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%

Drawdowns

RSPA vs. SPDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, smaller than the maximum SPDV drawdown of -43.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and SPDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPASPDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-43.81%

+28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-13.91%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-3.31%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-6.67%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.29%

-0.97%

Volatility

RSPA vs. SPDV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) at 3.07%. This indicates that RSPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSPASPDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.07%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

9.25%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

17.61%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

16.41%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.39%

20.48%

-7.09%