PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. PFLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than PFLD's 2.63% return.


SPDV

1D
0.35%
1M
3.08%
YTD
14.63%
6M
15.97%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

PFLD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.63%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
14.63%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%2.36%
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
2.63%1.44%5.48%8.16%-12.73%4.49%5.34%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and PFLD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019

0.41

The correlation between SPDV and PFLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDV vs. PFLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
PFLD

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%

-

Energy

12.3%

-

Technology

11.1%

-

Healthcare

9.7%

-

Financial Services

9.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.1%

-

Real Estate

8.7%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Communication Services

7.8%

-

Utilities

5.8%
100.0%

Basic Materials

5.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
13.5%
PFLD

-

Energy

SPDV
12.3%
PFLD

-

Technology

SPDV
11.1%
PFLD

-

Healthcare

SPDV
9.7%
PFLD

-

Financial Services

SPDV
9.2%
PFLD

-

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
9.1%
PFLD

-

Real Estate

SPDV
8.7%
PFLD

-

Industrials

SPDV
7.8%
PFLD

-

Communication Services

SPDV
7.8%
PFLD

-

Utilities

SPDV
5.8%
PFLD
100.0%

Basic Materials

SPDV
5.1%
PFLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLD
PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDVPFLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

1.83

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

2.99

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

2.60

+2.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.31

11.57

+2.73

SPDV vs. PFLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the PFLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and PFLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDVPFLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.83

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.14

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.17

+0.29

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than PFLD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and PFLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVPFLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-33.20%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-2.23%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-6.41%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-15.51%

-5.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-4.18%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.50%

+1.51%

Volatility

SPDV vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.89%. This indicates that SPDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVPFLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

0.89%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

2.26%

+5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

3.42%

+8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

7.50%

+8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

13.38%

+6.94%

SPDV vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PFLD's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than PFLD's 5.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
5.60%6.52%7.09%7.09%5.76%4.52%4.79%0.82%0.00%0.00%
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.30%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and PFLD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PFLD (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs PFLD's -33.20%.

On 5-year performance, SPDV leads with 8.27% vs 1.04% for PFLD. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPDV has performed better with a 8.27% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFLD.

PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 3.30% for SPDV.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while PFLD is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.45% for PFLD.

SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and PFLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer