SPDV vs. PFLD
SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) and PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while PFLD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPDV returned 8.27%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PFLD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPDV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFLD.
Performance
SPDV vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than PFLD's 2.63% return.
SPDV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 15.97%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
PFLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SPDV vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 14.63% | 10.90% | 14.40% | 5.45% | -2.27% | 29.54% | -6.09% | 2.36% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.63% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 8.16% | -12.73% | 4.49% | 5.34% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDV and PFLD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.41 |
The correlation between SPDV and PFLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPDV vs. PFLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPDV
PFLD
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPDV
PFLD
-
Energy
SPDV
PFLD
-
Technology
SPDV
PFLD
-
Healthcare
SPDV
PFLD
-
Financial Services
SPDV
PFLD
-
Consumer Defensive
SPDV
PFLD
-
Real Estate
SPDV
PFLD
-
Industrials
SPDV
PFLD
-
Communication Services
SPDV
PFLD
-
Utilities
SPDV
PFLD
Basic Materials
SPDV
PFLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDV vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank
SPDV
PFLD
SPDV vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDV | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 1.83 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 2.99 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | 2.60 | +2.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | 11.57 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDV | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.83 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.14 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.17 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
SPDV vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than PFLD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and PFLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDV | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.81% | -33.20% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -2.23% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.62% | -6.41% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.31% | -15.51% | -5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -4.18% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 0.50% | +1.51% |
Volatility
SPDV vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.89%. This indicates that SPDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDV | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 0.89% | +2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 2.26% | +5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 3.42% | +8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 7.50% | +8.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 13.38% | +6.94% |
SPDV vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PFLD's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDV vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison
SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than PFLD's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 3.30% | 3.85% | 3.54% | 3.95% | 3.73% | 3.08% | 3.90% | 3.54% | 3.63% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDV and PFLD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPDV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PFLD (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs PFLD's -33.20%.
On 5-year performance, SPDV leads with 8.27% vs 1.04% for PFLD. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPDV has performed better with a 8.27% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFLD.
PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 3.30% for SPDV.
SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while PFLD is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.45% for PFLD.
SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDV and PFLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer