PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSP vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSP vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
0.94%11.21%7.60%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-0.84%12.92%6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's -0.84% return.


RSP

1D
0.32%
1M
-5.49%
YTD
0.94%
6M
2.11%
1Y
12.90%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
11.21%

BUFP

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
-0.84%
6M
1.58%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSP vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSP vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPBUFPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

1.25

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

1.89

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.73

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.64

9.93

-5.29

RSP vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.25

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.05

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and BUFP is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RSP vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.62%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RSP vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and BUFP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-11.98%

-47.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-8.16%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.66%

-2.05%

-3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-1.08%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.42%

+1.38%

Volatility

RSP vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 3.45%. This indicates that RSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSPBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

3.45%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.84%

5.01%

+3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

11.12%

+6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

9.78%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

9.78%

+8.58%