RSJN vs. JULB
RSJN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSJN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.
Performance
RSJN vs. JULB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSJN achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.38% return.
RSJN
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 13.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSJN vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June | 7.32% | 2.66% |
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.38% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSJN and JULB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSJN vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank
RSJN
JULB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSJN vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June (RSJN) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSJN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSJN vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSJN drawdown since its inception was -12.44%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSJN and JULB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSJN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.44% | -5.24% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.43% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -0.83% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | — | — |
Volatility
RSJN vs. JULB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSJN | JULB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.02% | 6.84% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 6.84% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 6.84% | +3.24% |
RSJN vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSJN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSJN vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison
Neither RSJN nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSJN and JULB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RSJN.
RSJN and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RSJN and 0.25% for JULB.
Find the right allocation for RSJN and JULB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer