PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSINX vs. FNKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSINX vs. FNKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSINX having a 15.77% return and FNKFX slightly higher at 16.06%.


RSINX

1D
1.06%
1M
6.06%
6M
11.70%
YTD
15.77%
1Y
24.09%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
11.06%
ALL TIME*
8.73%

FNKFX

1D
1.14%
1M
-1.27%
6M
10.29%
YTD
16.06%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RSINX vs. FNKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
15.77%6.39%20.81%13.18%-2.02%25.73%-1.68%7.58%
FNKFX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund
16.06%11.07%21.99%11.55%-5.98%27.16%11.27%8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RSINX and FNKFX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between RSINX and FNKFX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSINX vs. FNKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSINX
RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FNKFX
FNKFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FNKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FNKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSINX vs. FNKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSINXFNKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.83

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

10.09

+0.53

RSINX vs. FNKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the FNKFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSINX and FNKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSINX vs. FNKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSINX drawdown since its inception was -66.11%, which is greater than FNKFX's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSINX and FNKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSINXFNKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.11%

-41.25%

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.67%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-21.86%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-21.86%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.13%

+3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.48%

-4.91%

-5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.42%

-0.04%

Volatility

RSINX vs. FNKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) is 3.41%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that RSINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSINXFNKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

4.19%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

13.19%

-5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

16.76%

-4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

18.86%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

21.86%

-2.79%

RSINX vs. FNKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSINX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FNKFX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSINX vs. FNKFX - Dividend Comparison

RSINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than FNKFX's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNKFX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund
3.95%0.59%12.35%0.99%2.91%4.03%1.45%0.52%0.00%0.00%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
3.85%4.46%10.21%0.77%4.03%15.89%0.30%4.32%17.89%14.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSINX and FNKFX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNKFX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to RSINX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSINX dropped -66.11% vs FNKFX's -41.25%.

RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSINX and FNKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer