PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSIIX vs. FFRHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSIIX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSIIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RSIIX has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 5.27%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.95% annualized return.


RSIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.34%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
5.27%

FFRHX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.78%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.69%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSIIX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
1.81%6.04%8.44%9.59%-3.31%11.60%3.42%3.50%1.36%4.84%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.05%5.47%7.10%12.63%-1.55%5.01%1.69%8.63%0.10%3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RSIIX and FFRHX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.37

The correlation between RSIIX and FFRHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSIIX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSIIX
RSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSIIX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSIIXFFRHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.96

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

5.16

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.60

18.28

+4.32

RSIIX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSIIX and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSIIXFFRHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.62

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.05

1.92

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.84

1.20

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.68

1.15

+0.53

Drawdowns

RSIIX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSIIX drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSIIX and FFRHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSIIXFFRHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.55%

-22.20%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-1.19%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.79%

-3.29%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.61%

-5.90%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.55%

-22.20%

+6.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-1.15%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.34%

-0.08%

Volatility

RSIIX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) is 0.54%, while Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that RSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSIIXFFRHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.61%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

1.62%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

2.35%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.52%

2.88%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.88%

4.14%

-1.26%

RSIIX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSIIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSIIX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

RSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than FFRHX's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.07%7.41%6.94%8.24%3.81%2.74%3.84%5.15%4.74%4.05%4.44%3.69%
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
7.41%7.75%7.67%7.61%6.58%5.12%5.77%4.84%4.59%4.98%5.10%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSIIX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFRHX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to RSIIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSIIX dropped -15.55% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSIIX and FFRHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer