RSI.TO vs. SLF
RSI.TO (Rogers Sugar Inc.) and SLF (Sun Life Financial Inc.) are both stocks. RSI.TO operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive), while SLF operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RSI.TO returned 8.34%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for SLF. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSI.TO vs. SLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RSI.TO is traded in CAD, while SLF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSI.TO achieves a 18.07% return, which is significantly lower than SLF's 27.84% return. Over the past 10 years, RSI.TO has underperformed SLF with an annualized return of 8.34%, while SLF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.
RSI.TO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 18.07%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 30.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
SLF
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 27.84%
- 6M
- 31.27%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
RSI.TO vs. SLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 18.07% | 7.81% | 16.22% | 0.71% | 1.50% | 12.89% | 22.74% | -3.50% | -8.26% | -1.78% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 27.84% | 4.72% | 29.60% | 14.97% | -7.37% | 29.65% | -0.86% | 36.81% | -9.34% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSI.TO and SLF is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | 0.18 |
The correlation between RSI.TO and SLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RSI.TO:
CA$1.04B
SLF:
$30.85B
RSI.TO:
CA$0.47
SLF:
CA$6.22
RSI.TO:
14.64
SLF:
17.21
RSI.TO:
0.82
SLF:
1.43
RSI.TO:
2.19
SLF:
1.89
RSI.TO:
CA$1.24B
SLF:
CA$39.40B
RSI.TO:
CA$199.73M
SLF:
CA$20.48B
RSI.TO:
CA$150.40M
SLF:
CA$4.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSI.TO vs. SLF — Risk / Return Rank
RSI.TO
SLF
RSI.TO vs. SLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSI.TO | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 1.77 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.98 | 4.29 | +5.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSI.TO vs. SLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSI.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.56%, smaller than the maximum SLF drawdown of -71.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI.TO and SLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSI.TO | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.56% | -71.22% | +28.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -14.60% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | -14.60% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.14% | -24.85% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | -46.41% | +11.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -14.15% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 6.02% | -2.93% |
Volatility
RSI.TO vs. SLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO) is 3.08%, while Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that RSI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSI.TO | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 5.09% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 14.39% | -5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 20.74% | -6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 20.35% | -4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 23.53% | -4.66% |
Dividends
RSI.TO vs. SLF - Dividend Comparison
RSI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than SLF's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 5.19% | 6.05% | 6.13% | 6.69% | 6.33% | 6.05% | 6.42% | 7.32% | 6.62% | 5.70% | 5.29% | 8.49% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 3.47% | 4.03% | 4.00% | 4.98% | 4.59% | 3.32% | 3.69% | 3.47% | 4.71% | 3.17% | 3.98% | 4.64% |
Financials
RSI.TO vs. SLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rogers Sugar Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSI.TO vs. SLF - Profitability Comparison
RSI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.72M and revenue of 280.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
SLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
RSI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported an operating income of 27.98M and revenue of 280.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
SLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
RSI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported a net income of 12.65M and revenue of 280.62M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
SLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSI.TO and SLF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RSI.TO and SLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer