RSHO vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSHO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSHO returned 61.78% vs 115.98% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. RSHO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

RSHO vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSHO achieves a 39.40% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 17.65% return.

RSHO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.76%
• YTD: 39.40%
• 6M: 36.26%
• 1Y: 61.78%
• 3Y*: 30.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 45.64%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 115.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSHO vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	39.40%	27.03%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	17.65%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between RSHO and WNTR is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.35

Return for Risk

RSHO vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSHO vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSHO	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	2.20	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.46	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.33	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	2.73	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.97	6.99	+9.98

RSHO vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSHO and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSHO vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSHO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSHO and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSHO	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.31%	-42.65%	+15.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.64%	-42.65%	+28.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.02%	+4.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.27%	-20.87%	+16.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	16.66%	-12.83%

Volatility

RSHO vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) is 9.26%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that RSHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSHO	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.26%	18.14%	-8.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.99%	46.41%	-25.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.93%	53.16%	-28.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.82%	53.31%	-30.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.82%	53.31%	-30.49%

RSHO vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSHO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSHO vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

RSHO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	0.21%	0.30%	0.26%	0.25%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	94.34%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSHO and WNTR in my portfolio?

RSHO and WNTR have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSHO or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to RSHO (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSHO dropped -27.31% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, RSHO or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 61.78% for RSHO. On fees, RSHO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RSHO has been the lower-risk option at 9.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSHO or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 61.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSHO or WNTR?

RSHO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSHO or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.21% for RSHO.

What is the main difference between RSHO and WNTR?

RSHO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Tema and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RSHO and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.