RSHO vs. SRHQ
RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. RSHO is actively managed, while SRHQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSHO returned 31.02%/yr vs 17.11%/yr for SRHQ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSHO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.
Performance
RSHO vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSHO achieves a 33.69% return, which is significantly higher than SRHQ's 11.72% return.
RSHO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 33.69%
- 6M
- 33.85%
- 1Y
- 57.71%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRHQ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSHO vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 33.69% | 19.23% | 17.28% | 28.26% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 11.72% | 7.34% | 16.49% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSHO and SRHQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between RSHO and SRHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSHO vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSHO
SRHQ
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
RSHO
SRHQ
Technology
RSHO
SRHQ
Basic Materials
RSHO
SRHQ
Consumer Cyclical
RSHO
SRHQ
Energy
RSHO
SRHQ
Financial Services
RSHO
SRHQ
Communication Services
RSHO
-
SRHQ
Consumer Defensive
RSHO
-
SRHQ
Healthcare
RSHO
-
SRHQ
Real Estate
RSHO
-
SRHQ
Utilities
RSHO
-
SRHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSHO vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank
RSHO
SRHQ
RSHO vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSHO | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.26 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 3.50 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.16 | 11.97 | +3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSHO | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 1.50 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 1.06 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
RSHO vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSHO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSHO and SRHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSHO | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.31% | -18.50% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -6.31% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.31% | -18.50% | -8.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.72% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -3.08% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 1.84% | +1.98% |
Volatility
RSHO vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison
Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) at 3.48%. This indicates that RSHO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSHO | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 3.48% | +5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | 10.71% | +9.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.74% | 14.75% | +8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 16.03% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 16.03% | +6.52% |
RSHO vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSHO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSHO vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison
RSHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than SRHQ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.00% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.84% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSHO and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSHO has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to SRHQ (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSHO dropped -27.31% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.
On 3-year performance, RSHO leads with 31.02% vs 17.11% for SRHQ. On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SRHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 31.02% return vs 17.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.
SRHQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.22% for RSHO.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RSHO and 0.35% for SRHQ.
RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSHO and SRHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer